Effects of Head Lift Exercise on Oropharyngeal Swallowing Function and Dropout Rate According to Reclining Angle in Patients with Dysphagia after Stroke: A Randomized Trial / 대한연하장애학회지

Objective@#Although the effects of head lift exercise (HLE) in the reclining position have been reported, there is insufficient clinical evidence of the effects. This study compared the effects of HLE in the 0° supine position and 45° reclining position on the swallowing function and the compliance of patients with dysphagia after stroke after both exercises. @*Methods@#This was a randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Thirty-five patients with stroke and dysphagia were assigned randomly to HLE in the 0° supine group (n=18) or HLE in the 45° reclining group (n=17). Patients in both groups performed HLE five days a week for four weeks and received the same conventional dysphagia therapy. The videofluoroscopic dy sphagia scale (VDS) was used to evaluate the swallowing function. The dropout rate and subjective feedback related to compliance with the two exercises were monitored. @*Results@#No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. Patients in both groups showed significant improvement in the oral and pharyngeal phases of VDS (P＜0.05). After the intervention, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P＞0.05). Dropout rates of 22% and 6% owing to neck discomfort or fatigue were observed in the HLE in 0° supine group and the HLE in 45° reclining group, respectively. @*Conclusion@#HLE in the 45° reclining position has a similar effect on the swallowing function in patients with dysphagia after stroke to that of HLE in the 0° supine position and is associated with better exercise compliance.

Liver Transplantation after Successful Downstaging with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. The majority of patients with HCC are diagnosed at advanced disease stages with vascular invasion, where curative approaches are often not feasible. Currently, sorafenib is the only available standard therapy for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). However, in many cases, sorafenib therapy fails to achieve satisfactory results in clinical practice. We present a case of advanced HCC with PVTT that was treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by liver transplantation. Three cycles of HAIC treatment resulted in necrotic changes in most of the tumors, and PVTT was reduced to an extent at which liver transplantation was possible. Further studies are required to determine the treatment strategies for advanced HCC with PVTT that can improve prognosis.

Laparoscopic end-to-end biliary reconstruction with T-tube for transected bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

PURPOSE: This report describes the laparoscopic end-to-end biliary reconstruction with T-tube for transected bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis for all patients with a transected BDI at a single institution. We collected and analyzed data for injury site and type, reconstruction methods, conversion rate, previous intervention, and outcomes. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2017, 2,901 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a single institution. Among them, 8 patients experienced a transected BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, so the surgeon performed laparoscopic end-to-end biliary reconstruction with T-tube. Our patient series consisted of 6 women (75%) and 2 men (25%) with a mean age of 48.3 years (median, 49 years; range, 29–77 years). Two cases were converted to open surgery. The most common injured site was the common bile duct (5 of 8, 62.5%). The most common injury type, using Bismuth's classification system, was type I (3 of 8, 37.5%). The mean operating time was 136.8 minutes (median, 135.0 minutes; range, 0–180.0 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 7.0 days (median, 4.5 days, range: 3.0–21.0 days). The mean follow-up was 36.4 months (median, 34.0 months; range, 16.0–63.0 months). We observed one postoperative complication during the follow-up period. The patient had an anastomosis site leakage and was cured after reoperation. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic end-to-end biliary reconstruction with T-tube for transected BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be safe and feasible in selected patients. However, long-term follow-up to identify complications from bile duct stricture remains important.

ABO Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience / 대한이식학회지

BACKGROUND: This study examined the outcomes of ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The changes in the immunologic factors that might help predict the long term outcomes were also studied. METHODS: Twenty-three patients, who underwent ABO incompatible LDLT from 2010 to 2015, were reviewed retrospectively. The protocol was the same as for ABO compatible LDLT except for the administration of rituximab and plasma exchange. The clinical outcomes and immunologic factors, such as isoagglutinin titer and cluster of differentiation 20+ (CD20+) lymphocyte levels were reviewed. RESULTS: The center showed a 3-year survival of 64% with no case of antibody-mediated rejection. When transplantation-unrelated mortalities (for example, traffic accidents and myocardial infarction) were removed from statistical analysis, the 3-year survival was 77.8%. Although isoagglutinin titers continued to remain at low levels, the CD20+ lymphocyte levels recovered to the pre-Rituximab levels at postoperative one year. CONCLUSIONS: As donor shortages continue, ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible method to expand the donor pool. On the other hand, caution is still needed until more long-term outcomes are reported. Because CD20+ lymphocytes are recovered with time, more immunologic studies will be needed in the future.

Outcome of donor biliary complications following living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biliary complications are the most common donor complication following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term outcomes of biliary complications in right lobe adult-to-adult LDLT donors, and to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment of these donors. METHODS: The medical charts of right lobe donors who developed biliary complications between June 2000 and January 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 337 right lobe donors, 49 developed biliary complications, including 36 diagnosed with biliary leakage and 13 with biliary stricture. Multivariate analysis showed that biliary leakage was associated with the number of right lobe bile duct orifices. Sixteen donors, five with leakage and 11 with strictures, underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). ERC was clinically successful in treating eight of the 11 strictures, one by balloon dilatation and seven by endobiliary stenting. Of the remained three, two were treated by rescue percutaneous biliary drainage and one by conservative care. Of the five patients with leakage, four were successfully treated using endobiliary stents and one with conservative care. In overall, total 35 improved with conservative treatment. All inserted stents were successfully retrieved after a median 264 days (range, 142 to 502) and there were no recurrences of stricture or leakages during a median follow-up of 10.6 years (range, 8 to 15.2). CONCLUSIONS: All donors with biliary complications were successfully treated non-surgically, with most improving after endoscopic placement of endobiliary stents and none showing recurrence on long term follow-up.

Clinical outcome of 1,000 consecutive cases of liver transplantation: a single center experience

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze survival outcomes in 1,000 consecutive liver transplantations (LTs) performed at a single institution from 1993 to April 2017. METHODS: The study population was divided into 2 groups based on donor type: deceased donor LT (DDLT; n = 181, 18.1%) and living donor LT (LDLT; n = 819; 81.9%), and into 3 periods based on the number of cases (first 300 cases, middle 300 cases, last 400 cases). RESULTS: Infection was the most common cause of death, accounting for 34.8% (95 of 273). Mortality due to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence occurred most frequently between 1 and 5 years after transplantation. Mortality rate by graft rejection was highest between 5 and 10 years after transplantation. And mortality by de novo malignancy occurred most frequently after 10 years after transplantation. The patient survival rates for the entire population at 5 and 10 years were 74.7%, and 68.6%, respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the LDLT and DDLT groups (P = 0.188). Cause of disease, disease severity, case period, and retransplantation had a significant association with patient survival (P = 0.002, P = 0.031, P = 0.003, and P = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques and perioperative management for transplant patients have improved and undergone standardization. Controlling perioperative infection and managing patients with HCC as LT candidates will result in better outcomes.

Prognostic factors after curative resection hepatocellular carcinoma and the surgeon's role

PURPOSE: Patient, surgical, and tumor factors affect the outcome after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The surgical factors are only modifiable by the surgeon. We reviewed our experience with curative resection for HCC in terms of surgical factors. METHODS: After analyses of the prospectively collected clinical data of 256 consecutive patients undergoing surgical resection for HCC, prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified; all patients were stratified by tumor diameters > or 5 cm. CONCLUSION: Tumor recurrence after liver resection for HCC depends on tumor status, bleeding, and transfusions, which subsequently lead to poor patient survival. Surgeons can help improve the prognosis of patients by minimizing blood loss and transfusion, particularly in patients with larger tumors.

Human Leukocyte Antigen-C Genotype and Killer Immunoglobulin-like Receptor-Ligand Matching in Korean Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND: The interaction between killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and HLA class I regulates natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity and function. The impact of NK cell alloreactivity through KIR in liver transplantation remains unelucidated. Since the frequency of HLA-C and KIR genotypes show ethnic differences, we assessed the impact of HLA-C, KIR genotype, or KIR-ligand mismatch on the allograft outcome of Korean liver allografts. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two living donor liver transplant patients were studied. Thirty-five patients (19.2%) had biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR), and eighteen (9.9%) had graft failure. The HLA-C compatibility, KIR genotypes, ligand-ligand, and KIR-ligand matching was retrospectively investigated for association with allograft outcomes. RESULTS: Homozygous C1 ligands were predominant in both patients and donors, and frequency of the HLA-C2 allele in Koreans was lower than that in other ethnic groups. Despite the significantly lower frequency of the HLA-C2 genotype in Koreans, donors with at least one HLA-C2 allele showed higher rates of AR than donors with no HLA-C2 alleles (29.2% vs 15.7%, P=0.0423). Although KIR genotypes also showed ethnic differences, KIR genotypes and the number of activating KIR/inhibitory KIR were not associated with the allograft outcome. KIR-ligand mismatch was expected in 31.6% of Korean liver transplants and had no impact on AR or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not confirm the clinical impact of KIR genotypes and KIR-ligand mismatch. However, we demonstrated that the presence of HLA-C2 allele in the donor influenced AR of Korean liver allografts.

Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis using shore durometer

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether hardness of liver surface correlated with degree of liver fibrosis, and its association with posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS: A shore durometer was used to measure hepatic hardness in 41 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in 10 patients with normal liver. We investigated how hepatic hardness correlates with various values indicating the degree of liver fibrosis, and how it correlates with PHLF. RESULTS: In the normal liver group, the surface shore units (SU) was 15.06 ± 2.64. In the HCC group, there was a correlation between surface SU and preoperative results indicating liver fibrosis. Among patients with PHLF after resecting over 3 segments, the surface SU of patients with grade A PHLF was 21.85 ± 5.63, and the surface SU of patients with grade C PHLF was 35.75 ± 9.26. In patients with PHLF after resecting 2 or less segments, the surface SU of patients with PHLF grade A was 20.95 ± 5.18, and the surface SU of patients with PHLF grade B was 31.60 ± 5.57. In predicting PHLF, surface SU was more effective than preoperative platelet count, spleen volume, or liver fibrosis index. CONCLUSION: Hepatic hardness measured by the shore durometer was correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis. Liver surface SU was a more effective parameter for predicting PHLF, as compared to other indicators evaluated before hepatectomy. The decision to perform major hepatectomy should be reconsidered in cases with a liver surface SU of >30.

Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis using shore durometer

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether hardness of liver surface correlated with degree of liver fibrosis, and its association with posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS: A shore durometer was used to measure hepatic hardness in 41 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in 10 patients with normal liver. We investigated how hepatic hardness correlates with various values indicating the degree of liver fibrosis, and how it correlates with PHLF. RESULTS: In the normal liver group, the surface shore units (SU) was 15.06 ± 2.64. In the HCC group, there was a correlation between surface SU and preoperative results indicating liver fibrosis. Among patients with PHLF after resecting over 3 segments, the surface SU of patients with grade A PHLF was 21.85 ± 5.63, and the surface SU of patients with grade C PHLF was 35.75 ± 9.26. In patients with PHLF after resecting 2 or less segments, the surface SU of patients with PHLF grade A was 20.95 ± 5.18, and the surface SU of patients with PHLF grade B was 31.60 ± 5.57. In predicting PHLF, surface SU was more effective than preoperative platelet count, spleen volume, or liver fibrosis index. CONCLUSION: Hepatic hardness measured by the shore durometer was correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis. Liver surface SU was a more effective parameter for predicting PHLF, as compared to other indicators evaluated before hepatectomy. The decision to perform major hepatectomy should be reconsidered in cases with a liver surface SU of >30.

A simple pancreaticojejunostomy technique for hard pancreases using only two transpancreatic sutures with buttresses: a comparison with the previous pancreaticogastrostomy and dunking methods

PURPOSE: In this study, we introduced a novel technique, the pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), which uses only two transpancreatic sutures with buttresses (PJt), and compared the surgical outcomes with previously used methods, especially for hard pancreases. METHODS: A total of 101 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with hard pancreases were enrolled and divided into 3 groups according to the method of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: 30 patients (29.7%) underwent the conventional dunking method (Du), 31 patients (30.7%) underwent pancreaticogastrostomy using transpancreatic sutures (PGt) and 40 patients (39.6%) underwent PJ using transpancreatic sutures (PJt). The surgical outcomes were compared according to the type of anastomosis to analyze the feasibility and ease of each technique. RESULTS: The overall operative time was shorter in the PJt group (325.1 +/- 63.8 minutes) than in the PGt group (367.3 +/- 70.5 minutes) or the Du group (412.0 +/- 38.2 minutes, P < 0.001). In terms of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis time, it was also shorter in the PJt group (10.3 +/- 3.5 minutes) than in the Du group (20.7 +/- 0.7 minutes) or the PGt group (16.8 +/- 5.4 minutes, P = 0.005). Significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) developed in 2 cases (6.7%) in the Du group, whereas there were no POPF cases in the PGt or PJt groups (P = 0.086). Overall postoperative morbidities occurred in 31 cases (30.7%), and there were no significant differences among the 3 groups (P = 0.692). CONCLUSION: The novel PJ technique, which uses only two transpancreatic sutures with buttresses, is a very simple, easy and secure method for hard pancreases and can be performed in a shorter amount of time compared with conventional methods.

Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution

PURPOSE: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is expected to be favorable for obtaining the negative tangential margin with oncologic feasibility through the horizontal dissection in a right-to-left fashion for radical lymph node dissections. METHODS: From January 2007 to February 2015, a total of 30 RAMPS and 19 conventional distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases were enrolled. The demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes were compared according to the type of surgery. RESULTS: The mean operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were similar between 2 groups. Morbidities were reported in 14 cases of RAMPS (46.7%) and 8 cases of DP (42.1%) (P = 0.777). The rate of negative tangential margin (96.2%) and the number of harvested lymph nodes (mean ± standard deviation, 21.5 ± 8.3) were significantly higher in RAMPS group (P = 0.011, P = 0.003, respectively). In terms of survival outcomes, there was no significant difference in regard to the overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 30.4% in RAMPS vs. 35.0% in DP, P = 0.354) or overall survival (OS; 29.9% vs. 29.4%, P = 0.429) between the 2 groups. After exclusion of cases with nodal invasion, however, the RAMPS group had a longer DFS than the DP group (55.6% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.048) although OS was similar without significant difference (42.4% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.197). CONCLUSION: RAMPS is a safe and oncologically feasible procedure in left-sided pancreatic cancer by obtaining a successful negative tangential margin and radical lymph node dissection. The authors suggest it could also be useful for local control, especially for the limited left-sided pancreatic cancer without nodal invasion.

Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution

PURPOSE: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is expected to be favorable for obtaining the negative tangential margin with oncologic feasibility through the horizontal dissection in a right-to-left fashion for radical lymph node dissections. METHODS: From January 2007 to February 2015, a total of 30 RAMPS and 19 conventional distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases were enrolled. The demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes were compared according to the type of surgery. RESULTS: The mean operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were similar between 2 groups. Morbidities were reported in 14 cases of RAMPS (46.7%) and 8 cases of DP (42.1%) (P = 0.777). The rate of negative tangential margin (96.2%) and the number of harvested lymph nodes (mean ± standard deviation, 21.5 ± 8.3) were significantly higher in RAMPS group (P = 0.011, P = 0.003, respectively). In terms of survival outcomes, there was no significant difference in regard to the overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 30.4% in RAMPS vs. 35.0% in DP, P = 0.354) or overall survival (OS; 29.9% vs. 29.4%, P = 0.429) between the 2 groups. After exclusion of cases with nodal invasion, however, the RAMPS group had a longer DFS than the DP group (55.6% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.048) although OS was similar without significant difference (42.4% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.197). CONCLUSION: RAMPS is a safe and oncologically feasible procedure in left-sided pancreatic cancer by obtaining a successful negative tangential margin and radical lymph node dissection. The authors suggest it could also be useful for local control, especially for the limited left-sided pancreatic cancer without nodal invasion.

Culture with Growth Factor Supplements Improves the Viability and Function of Rat Hepatocytes / 대한이식학회지

BACKGROUND: To identify the optimum culture conditions by investigating isolated rat hepatocytes cultured in medium containing different growth factors. METHODS: Hepatocytes were isolated from rats using a two-step perfusion technique and divided into the following four groups cultured in medium containing different growth factors: control, epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin, and EGF+insulin. The viability of the cultured rat hepatocytes and liver function parameters, including albumin, ammonia, and urea in the culture medium, were measured. Hepatocyte morphology was examined by staining with hematoxylin and eosin, and albumin receptor expression was confirmed by immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Slightly higher viability was observed in the growth factor groups than in the control group, although without significance (P=0.073). The levels of albumin (P=0.001), ammonia (P<0.001), and urea (P=0.041) differed significantly among the four groups. The functional parameters in the growth factor groups, particularly the EGF+insulin group, were significantly superior to those in the control group. The morphology of the hepatocytes in all growth factor groups was well maintained at 10 days. However, the control group showed deterioration in cell morphology by day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Morphological and functional assessment indicated that the presence of growth factors, particularly EGF+insulin, provided culture conditions superior to those of non-supplemented medium.

De novo hepatitis B virus infection developing after liver transplantation using a graft positive for hepatitis B core antibody

PURPOSE: The use of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive grafts is increasing, especially where hepatitis B is endemic. However, this remains controversial because of the risk of development of de novo HBV infection. METHODS: We collected information obtained between January 2000 and December 2012 and retrospectively analyzed data on 187 HBsAg-negative donors and recipients were analyzed retrospectively. De novo HBV infection was defined as development of HBsAg positivity with or without detection of HBV DNA. RESULTS: Forty patients (21.4%) received HBcAb-positive grafts. Survival rate did not differ by donor HBcAb status (P = 0.466). De novo HBV infection occurred in five patients (12.5%) who were not treated with anti-HBV prophylaxis, and was significantly more prevalent in hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb)- and HBcAb-negative than HBsAb- and HBcAb-positive recipients (50% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.049). All patients except one were treated with entecavir with/without antihepatitis B immunoglobulin and four were negative in terms of HBV DNA seroconversion. No patient died. CONCLUSION: HBcAb-positive grafts are safe without survival difference. However, the risk of de novo hepatitis B virus infection was significantly increased in HBsAb- and HBcAb-negative recipients. All patients were successfully treated even after recurrence.

Clinical significance of single-port laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison of single-port and multiport laparoscopic procedure

PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic splenectomy has been performed sporadically. The aim of this study is to assess our experience with single-port laparoscopic splenectomy compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for the usual treatment modality for various kinds of splenic disease. METHODS: Between October 2008 to February 2014, 29 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic splenectomy and 32 patients received multiport laparoscopic splenectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of single-port group and multiport group. RESULTS: The body mass index and disease profiles of the both groups were similar. The operative times of single-port and multiport group were 113.6 +/- 39.9 and 95.9 +/- 38.9 minutes, respectively (P = 0.946). The operative blood loss of the two groups were 295.8 +/- 301.3 and 322.5 +/- 254.5 mL (P = 0.582). Postoperative retrieved splenic weight of the single-port and multiport groups were 283.9 +/- 300.7 and 362.3 +/- 471.8 g, respectively (P = 0.261). One single-port partial splenectomy and 6 multiport partial splenectomies were performed in this study. There was one intraoperative gastric wall injury. It occurred in single-port group, which was successfully managed during the operation. Each case was converted to laparotomy in both groups due to bleeding. There was one mortality case in the multiport laparoscopic splenectomy group, which was not related to the splenectomy. Mean hospital stay of the single-port and multiport group was 5.8 +/- 2.5 and 7.3 +/- 5.2 days respectively (P = 0.140). CONCLUSION: Single-port laparoscopic splenectomy seems to be a feasible approach for various kinds of splenic disease compared to multiport laparoscopic surgery.

Clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver transplant patients are at high risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization. We evaluated patients before and after liver transplant using active surveillance culture (ASC) to assess the prevalence of MRSA and VRE and to determine the effect of bacterial colonization on patient outcome. METHODS: We performed ASC on 162 liver transplant recipients at the time of transplantation and 7 days posttransplantation to monitor the prevalence of MRSA and VRE. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients had both nasal and rectal ASCs. Of these patients, MRSA was isolated from 12 (7.4%) at the time of transplantation (group 1a), 9 (6.9%) acquired MRSA posttransplantation (group 2a), and 121 did not test positive for MRSA at either time (group 3a). Among the three groups, group 1a patients had the highest frequency of developing a MRSA infection (p < 0.01); however, group 2a patients had the highest mortality rate associated with MRSA infection (p = 0.05). Of the 142 patients, VRE colonization was detected in 37 patients (22.8%) at the time of transplantation (group 1b), 21 patients (20%) acquired VRE posttransplantation (group 2b), and 84 patients did not test positive for VRE at either time (group 3b). Among these three groups, group 2b patients had the highest frequency of VRE infections (p < 0.01) and mortality (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients that acquired VRE or MRSA posttransplantation had higher mortality rates than did those who were colonized pre-transplantation or those who never acquired the pathogens. Our findings highlight the importance of preventing the acquisition of MRSA and VRE posttransplantation to reduce infections and mortality among liver transplant recipients.

A novel pancreaticogastrostomy method using only two transpancreatic sutures: early postoperative surgical results compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) using two transpancreatic sutures with a buttress method through an anterior gastrostomy (PGt), and compare these results with our previous experience with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) including the dunking and duct to mucosa methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: In this study, 171 patients who had undergone PD between January 2005 and April 2013 were classified into three groups according to the method of the pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: dunking PJ (PJu group; n = 67, 39.1%), duct to mucosa PJ (PJm group; n = 41, 23.9%), and PGt (PGt group; n = 63, 36.8%). We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and surgical results. RESULTS: Both groups had comparable demographics and pathology, and there were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, or postoperative hospital stay. Within the two groups, morbidities occurred in 49 cases (10.7%), and were not significantly different between the two groups, excepting postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The PGt group had a lower rate of POPF (18/63, 28.6%) than the PJu and PJm groups (21/67, 31.3% and 19/41, 46.3%; P = 0.048), especially in terms of grades B and C POPF (4/63 [6.3%] in the PGt group vs. 7/67 [10.4%] in the PJu group and 9/41 [22.0%] in the PJm group, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The PGt method showed feasible outcomes for POPF and had advantages over dunking PJ and duct to mucosa PJ with respect to immediate postoperative results. PGt may be a promising technique for pancreaticoenteric anastomosis after PD.

Dual-incision laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy has been widely performed for benign and borderline malignancy in the body or tail of the pancreas when there are not oncologic indications for splenectomy. As the need for minimally invasive procedures to reduce postoperative morbidity and improve the quality of life is increasing, many surgeons have attempted to reduce the number of trocars and incision size to minimize access trauma and scarring. Single-port laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is the result of these efforts; however it has many limitations such as technical difficulty and prolonged operation time. In this article, we report the first case of dual-incision laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, proving that it can be a safe and feasible minimally invasive procedure for benign or borderline malignant tumors in the body or tail of the pancreas.

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Survival outcome of locally advanced pancreatic cancer has been poor and little is known about prognostic factors of the disease, especially in locally advanced cases treated with concurrent chemoradiation. This study was to analyze overall survival and prognostic factors of patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 34 patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer and treated with definitive CCRT, from December 2003 to December 2012, were reviewed. Median prescribed radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 41.4 to 55.8 Gy), once daily, five times per week, 1.8 to 3 Gy per fraction. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 10 months (range, 0 to 49 months), median overall survival was 9 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 40% and 10%, respectively. Median and mean time to progression were 5 and 7 months, respectively. Prognostic parameters related to overall survival were post-CCRT CA19-9 (p = 0.02), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (p < 0.01), and radiation dose (p = 0.04) according to univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, post-CCRT CA19-9 value below 180 U/mL and ECOG status 0 or 1 were statistically significant independent prognostic factors associated with improved overall survival (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall treatment results in locally advanced pancreatic cancer are relatively poor and few improvements have been accomplished in the past decades. Post-treatment CA19-9 below 180 U/mL and ECOG performance status 0 and 1 were significantly associated with an improved overall survival.